Week Two readings required us to look at three different Learning Design and Evaluation Frameworks:-
- TPACK framework
- Learning Engagement Theory
- Blooms Taxonomy
Once we analysed and evaluated the three frameworks we were asked to come up with our own Learning Design Framework that would be a "recipe" that can be changed, moulded, and selected from to underpin consistently good unit design. (Discussion forum response from W.Fasso, March 7, 2011.)
I find it difficult to believe that two weeks into the course I am already designing a preferred learning framework that is based on a number of different frameworks and theories. I am surprised that there are so many different theories and options out there! It makes sense though. If I design something now using a scaffold, it will most likely improve as I use it more and apply and analyse it on a regular basis. So just as there are my framework will improve and be modified over time, so will all these other theories and frameworks. We are always learning!
My framework is a combination of all three frameworks discussed in the reading.
I used a combination of the three just because it made the most sense to me after reflecting on the readings. Mishra and Koehler (2006) put forward the TPACK Framework which incorporates technologies into sound pedagogy and builds on Shulmans ‘Pedagogical Content Knowledge’ framework. Mishra and Koehler propose that Technologies, along with Content and Pedagogy are the three major components of the learning environment.
Another reason to incorporate technologies into my design framework is to engage the learner. Building on the Kearlsey and Schneiderman’s Engagement Framework which is intended to be a framework for technology based learning, I have incorporated the basic principles of the Engagement Framework into my learning design framework. These are:-
- Relate – collaboration and working with others to communicate, plan and lear
- Create – creating a purposeful activity linked to the learning experience
- Donate –making a useful contribution to an outside customer
These three principles ensure the framework provides for human interaction and a meaningful, authentic and deep learning experience. This then brings us to the third framework I have built into my learning design framework. It encourages my planning to focus on higher order thinking, not just the lower order thinking.
Blooms Revised Taxonomy presents a framework for deep understanding. This theory appeals to me as it is quite logical, you need to master one domain before moving onto the next. The Revised Taxonomy has 6 key areas Remember, Understand, Apply, Analyse, Evaluate and Create. My framework demonstrates moving through the levels progressively to the deepest understanding analysing, evaluating and creating.
No comments:
Post a Comment